Two Republican congressmen are challenging the conviction of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, for purchasing a firearm while being a user of illegal drugs. They argue that this conviction sets a troubling precedent, particularly affecting millions of marijuana users who legally own guns in states where cannabis is permitted.
After a federal jury found Hunter Biden guilty of three felony charges related to his purchase of a firearm while using crack cocaine, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) voiced strong opposition. Massie stated, “He might deserve to be in jail for something, but purchasing a gun is not it.” He further argued, “There are millions of marijuana users who own guns in this country, and none of them should be in jail for purchasing or possessing a firearm against current laws.”
Massie’s comments resonate with a broader critique of the federal statute that bans individuals who use illegal drugs, including marijuana, from buying or possessing firearms. This law has been contested in various federal courts over recent years. Currently, a significant case is pending review in the U.S. Supreme Court, which could have far-reaching implications for Second Amendment rights and marijuana reform.
In December, attorneys for Hunter Biden urged a federal court to dismiss the charges against their client, contending that the statute is unconstitutional. They argued that if this law were applied broadly, it would criminalize millions of marijuana users who comply with state laws where cannabis is legal.
Massie has been a long-time advocate for gun rights for cannabis consumers. He has consistently criticized his party for not advancing marijuana reform and has sponsored legislation aimed at allowing medical cannabis patients to purchase and possess firearms. His stance is that the current federal regulations unjustly infringe on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens.
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) highlighted Massie’s position during a House Rules Committee hearing, quoting him as an example of a Republican willing to speak out about the implications of Hunter Biden’s conviction on Second Amendment rights. McGovern’s acknowledgment underscores the bipartisan nature of concerns surrounding the intersection of gun rights and marijuana use.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), another advocate for marijuana reform, also questioned the merits of Hunter Biden’s conviction, albeit in a more succinct manner. “The Hunter Biden gun conviction is kinda dumb tbh,” Gaetz commented, indicating his skepticism about the rationale behind the conviction.
The Supreme Court case that could reshape the legal landscape involves a challenge to Section 922(g)(3) of the federal statute, which bars “unlawful users” of controlled substances from possessing firearms. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found this policy unconstitutional in a case involving a man convicted for possessing a gun while admitting to cannabis use. This ruling, if upheld by the Supreme Court, could potentially invalidate similar convictions, including that of Hunter Biden.
The outcome of these legal challenges could have significant implications for both gun rights and cannabis regulation in the United States. As the debate continues, lawmakers, legal experts, and advocates on both sides of the issue will be closely watching the developments.
Get ahead in the cannabis business. Subscribe for daily updates!
